Great Dance
Great Dance Blog



April 26, 2007

Video Headcams and the First Person Dance Experience

One of the hottest and sometimes inane crazes on the Internet these days is Justin.tv. Justin Kan has strapped a small video headcam to the side of his head and records everything he sees and hears 24/7. The video feed is streamed in real-time to Justin.tv where you can watch the feed. (Here's a video from San Francisco Chronicle that shows Justin in action.)

Justin TV

Photo credit: Cnet via Webware

Justin's video camera is connected to a notebook PC in his backpack. And the video stream is transmitted by a wireless broadband EV-DO card - such as the one offered by Verizon. All of this equipment is widely available and relatively easy to set-up.

There are a number of streaming video services that you can use to
transmit your live video feed in real-time. In a recent post from Robin Good's excellent Master New Media video-focused blog, you can learn how to "Broadcast Yourself Live on the Web." In particular, take a look at video applications UStream and Stickam, which you can use for live broadcasts from video-cams.

It would have been nice to have found a video of a dancer wearing a headcam so you could see an example of a dancer transmitting video from a first person perspective. But I couldn't find one. So if you haven't seen other examples of first-person videos, here's a video of a snowboarder wearing a headcam - it's nothing too exciting, but it gives you a general idea:


Headcams for Choreographers and Dancers in the Studio

What would be possible applications for video headcams in the dance world?

I think it would be fascinating to watch choreographers and dancers creating a new work from the first-person point of view.

Imagine a choreographer wearing a headcam similar to the one used by Justin. As the choreographer works with dancers to create a new work, the Internet audience gets to watch the process unfold in the exact same way that the choreographer does. I think that this type of real-time video would be captivating. Even the slow parts would be fascinating to see - a completely unedited, authentic behind-the-scenes look at how dances are created.

In addition, one or more dancers could have headcams of their own. So that way Internet viewers could watch the rehearsal process from both the choreographer's and the dancer's perspective.

I believe that this type of video programming would capture a large audience and sponsors would underwrite this initiative. This would especially be the case if big name choreographers participated in this project.

The real-time streaming video applications also have tools for community feedback. So as the dance-making process continues, the global Internet community would be sharing their feedback in text - or, for that matter, in audio or video formats. "Mr. Morris, I don't agree with your approach here, I just shot a video a few seconds ago that shows you how the dancers ought to perform this movement phrase." Mark Morris would then review my clip, and IM me back to tell me that my recommendation is right on the money!

Headcams for Dance Performances

One or more dancers equipped with video headcams during a performance would also be intriguing. Last year I wrote a post "Video Cams for Contact Improvisation, which addresses the same topic without the live Internet feed component.

Tomorrow I'm attending Daniel Burkholder's "My Ocean is never blue" performance at Dance Place.

I think it would be fun if a couple of the dancers wore video headcams that transmitted their feeds directly to the Internet for a global audience to watch. In addition, two monitors could be set-up on each side of the stage. This way the audience could watch the performance and simultaneously see two different first-person perspectives as experienced by the dancers.

Here's a brief section with a much smaller cast of "My Ocean is never blue" which was performed at the super-small Transformer gallery in DC last month. You can briefly see me in the back in the red shirt in the opening seconds:


Posted by Doug Fox on April 26, 2007 9:05 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://greatdance.com/mtadmin/mt-tb.cgi/709

6 Comments


Bill James said:

Doug, Way back in 1993 I made a CD-rom, which showed a fictional dance company, building, studios, rehearsals. A sequence let the user choose a point of view of rehearsal for a trio. When it was videotaped, each dancer wore a headcam and this allowed the user to choose from four points-of-view, including the choreographer's. This CD-rom was a prototype meant for schools, but was never marketed. I love your blog!

Added: April 27, 2007 2:32 PM | Permalink

Doug Fox said:

Bill, you were a visionary back in '93. You could have a similar multi-point-of-view setup and view, say, 4 different live video feeds on the same screen and create your own real-time production piece.

Thanks for the feedback!

Added: April 27, 2007 2:45 PM | Permalink

A few years ago, I actually wanted to do just this. My idea was to wear a camera, and as I danced, what I was seeing would be projected on screens so the audience could see what I see as they watched me. I also wanted to have myself hooked up to a heart monitor, so I'd be dancing to the rhythm of my own heart. Alas, but I couldn't obtain the technology.

Added: April 30, 2007 11:41 AM | Permalink

Doug Fox said:

Hi there ShanMonster,

I would have to look into specifics, but I don't think it should be too difficult or too expensive to project video from a headcam you're wearing onto screens in the performance space - for starters, you don't even need an internet connection.

In terms of a heart monitor, there must be an easy way to do this as well. One approach would be to capture the beat of your heart, convert the signal to MIDI format and then map the signal to whatever sounds you wish. If others have done, please share your thoughts.

Added: May 1, 2007 10:09 AM | Permalink

Olesia said:

VERY interesting idea for performances and tuition. In fact it has been done (on a limited basis) here in Russia in conjuction with a couple of universities. The problem, in ballet anyway, was that the eyes and the head don't necessarily 'look' at the same object so the result was very blurred specially when it recorded pirouettes which involve spotting. I saw the fouettés sequence and you felt ill looking at it !
But for some stuff it produced fascinating results so I am sure it could be used for modern/experimental dance.
I am still not convinced on how it could help choreographers or dancers themselves but I am sure if you had a video backdrop (like the Australians are using it in having a still digital photographer on stage with the dancers, her picture instantaneously being shown on the back drop of the set) it could provide a new dimension to modern dance.
I hope you keep us posted if you ever try it.
Olesia

Added: May 2, 2007 2:44 AM | Permalink

Doug Fox said:

Olesia,

I hope you can get back to dancing soon - I was just reading your MySpace page.

I wasn't really thinking about spotting and the position of the head and eyes. I was just assuming that the headcam would just make a smooth, even-paced video as dancer does pirouettes. But as you point out, that's not how turns are really done.

How does this help dancers and choreographers? If one of goals of headcam is for audiences to see dance from inside-out (from dancer's point-of-view), then dancers/choreographers might think about how they actually go about offering this perspective. For example, how should head be positioned differently to share different perspectives?

And how might the choreography be changed to accommodate or enhance the additional viewing angle now offered to audience members? The spacing, structures and movements that dancers see are always different from what the audience sees.

I've written recently about "Held" with the ADT.

Added: May 2, 2007 1:28 PM | Permalink

Leave a Comment




© 2007 Great Dance. All rights reserved.
Great Dance is a registered trademark.