Great Dance
Great Dance Blog



October 1, 2007

Dancing for a Better World and Commissioning Dance in New Ways

There are three important trends that I think the dance community should be avidly following and embracing:

1) TV dance shows are big hits.

2) Internet-based cause marketing and fund raising are growing by leaps and bounds.

3) Online video consumption continues to grow.

Dancing With the Stars

The importance of these developments is that choreographers and dancers now have new ways that they can support worthwhile causes and be commissioned to create new dances. Plus, additional revenue streams can be created for dancers while pursuing either of these two paths.

Let's first take a quick look at these three trends:

First, despite some grumblings in the concert dance community (read compelling posts on Foot In Mouth), the success of Dancing with the Stars and So You Think You Can Dance, represents a great development for everybody involved in dance. More people are excited about dance and energized by movement - that's an excellent start. As Clare Byrne said to me last Friday, these TV shows could potentially end-up having an impact on the concert dance community.

Second, Internet-based fundraising is one of the hottest trends out there. Read Wall Street Journal article by Rachel Emma Silverman, "A New Generation Reinvents Philanthropy: Blogs, Social-Networking Sites Give 20-Somethings a Means To Push, Fund Favorite Causes." There are many software applications and a range of strategies that not-for-profits can implement online to seek both small and large donations. On the popular social networking site Facebook, you can see a list (once you register) of different causes and the amounts of money that they have raised.

YouTube - Broadcast Your Cause

Third, Internet video continues its stellar rise to the point where it's now a mainstay of how web users expect to follow their favorite interests and past times. Plus, video is becoming part of fundraising campaigns as well. Take a look at YouTube's new "Broadcast Your Cause," which lets not-for-profits use this popular video service to seek donations from viewers. [via TVover.net and Watching TV Online].

New Avenues for Dance-Makers

These three trends lead to two major opportunities for choreographers and dancers:

Fusing movement with causes:

At any given time, choreographers around the world are making dances that deal with every topic and issue imaginable. Works are being created that either in a concrete or abstract form deal with global warming, human rights, health care and many other pressing issues of our time.

So why shouldn't these advocacy groups and dancers partner - online and offline - to expand and enhance their efforts on behalf of social justice and other initiatives?

If millions of TV viewers are engaged with dance, they are more open than ever to dance as a medium of communication and emotional connection. So if advocacy groups start featuring dancers in their online videos and in-person fundraising efforts, they are likely to connect with their audiences in new and compelling ways. Plus, from the position of dancers, they now have the opportunity to dance about what is meaningful to them, reach larger audiences and maybe benefit financially in some way from their involvement. For example, some fundraising efforts may serve both to raise money for a particular cause as well as to provide financial support for the participating artists.

New approaches to commissioning dance:

There is also a more commercial ramification to the trends I highlighted at the beginning of this post.

If more people are watching dance on TV and on the Internet and thus increasingly value movement as an important form of engagement and communication, why wouldn't more corporations, trade groups and associations commission dance works that deal with specific themes and ideas that are important for their companies and organizations? I realize that this may be a bit far-fetched in some instances, but I think it's worth considering.

Many meeting and conference organizers invest considerable financial resources in booking speakers and entertainment for their events. Why shouldn't they commission, instead, dance pieces that will help their audiences think about, grapple with and discuss pressing issues that need to be addressed? Wouldn't the kinesthetic energy of a performance open new avenues for viewers to approach and respond to these topics?

I don't know if a gathering of tax attorneys can be encouraged to commission a dance performance to help them explore the ramifications of creating tax shelters for their richest clients, but I'd wager that there are thousands of other groups who might be amenable to the idea.

Posted by Doug Fox on October 1, 2007 8:45 AM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://greatdance.com/mtadmin/mt-tb.cgi/1571

7 Comments


Hi Doug,

Great ideas, and I certainly hope there are people out there already working on them. I heard a NPR story about an annual conference of CEO's having "Hamlet" as a theme. The conference organizers hired a theatre company to moderate the proceedings and act out scenes from Hamlet. They had the CEO's doing role plays and engaging in discussion around themes from the play. I'm sure dance companies could similar sorts of outreach among the business and charitable foundations communities.

The ramifications of dance video on tv and the internet are huge and almost limitless. I will be addressing various aspects of this on Move the Frame, but thank you for pointing out the new fundraising tools on youtube and the web. This is really helpful and a good reminder of the increasing importance of good video promotional materials for dancers.

Added: October 1, 2007 12:26 PM | Permalink

Clare Byrne said:

Hi Doug,

I like your ideas. I am interested in creating dance for someone else's purpose, rather than/as well as my own. Call it my nostalgia for the Middle Ages and the Church's corporate sponsorship. I'm not saying that an artist's individual inspiration doesn't produce great art, but that's not the only way great art comes about. And I think we in the heady, Western, isolated world of high art can overly value individual inspiration. Does dance even do its best work as "high art" or "dance as compositions?" I ask myself this these days, even though the definitions themselves are contentious.

Yep, I am interested to see in what ways TV dance shows could potentially change the course of dancing history. Even though my interests in dance may be different (I also question how different they really are), I'm not afraid of what the TV dance shows might do to America, how they might affect me or audiences for dance. Who knows, they might begin to incorporate more and more of my interests, if I give them the chance. Or commission them.

As Maria was saying over at Foot in Mouth, I don't think dancing on a screen does the same thing as live dancing. The two presentations are not in competition with each other; within each there are myriad sub-categories of presentation, anyway. All of them can and will influence each other.

Added: October 1, 2007 4:36 PM | Permalink

Doug Fox said:

Anna,

The Hamlet example you give is fascinating. Theater definitely offers a good basis for role-playing and similar explorations. Dance without text could be more challenging to use to facilitate similar discussions. I'd to learn more about how choreographers have applied their work in corporate settings.

Added: October 1, 2007 8:06 PM | Permalink

Doug Fox said:

Clare,

Following-up on your mention of the differences between live performances and dance on the screen:

Despite my recommendations above about the ways that dance videos can be used to promote different causes, I've still never had anything close to the emotional reaction that I've had to a live performance while watching a video.

So I think the challenge for dance-makers and videographers is to figure out what is the best way to use the medium of video to create captivating and emotionally meaningful experiences. And some of the good examples of what to do may end-up coming from the TV dance shows.

Added: October 1, 2007 8:33 PM | Permalink

The question of competition between live and media is very interesting. I agree with both Doug and Clare that dance on screen is completely different from live dance. There are almost no similarities between them except that they are both kinetic time-based art forms. The problem is that on a grander scale media is not the friend of live arts. It's a competitor for sure, and it is overwhelmingly winning the fight.

There is a Performance Studies professor named Philip Auslander who wrote a great book called "Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture" where he looks at the history of media and its effects on live performance. While live performance isn't going to disappear completely, in terms of it's stake in cultural capital it is very very small and getting smaller. I'm not saying this to depress all of us, but to point out that if dance is to stay relevant in the larger culture it must gain a foothold in media. We need to have perspective on where we stand, and unfortunately live performance needs a mediatized host to survive these days. People have to be introduced to dance through media, the other gateways to the form are rapidly disappearing. Hopefully once they are introduced to the live experience, they will stick with it, but without the media gateway no one's going to get there.

Added: October 2, 2007 3:47 PM | Permalink

Clare Byrne said:

I'm not invested in dance on video ever being as emotionally captivating as live dance, although I cannot say for sure that that will be the case. What I am noticing about video is its ability to embed images and atmospheres in the viewer's eye -- perhaps circumventing a discernable emotional response -- so that those images are available for later influence, leverage, use. Advertising uses this extremely effectively.

This ties in, for me, to what Anna is saying -- that video dancing can function as leverage in getting audiences to live performances.

I would also say that dancing on camera in comparison to live dancing cannot be approached as a moral dilemma, or a discussion of which is better -- as in, live dancing is inherently more noble, real, authentic, full, "experiential." They are both exactly what they are, and, in addition, re-manifesting every second. Even the dance on the video doesn't stay the same. It changes as it is perceived by every particular eye.

Added: October 3, 2007 10:58 AM | Permalink

Boris Willis said:

Surely one is moved more by the presence of another person in the same space as you, which is why live dance is so compelling. However, we cannot reach out/market to people by saying come see live dance, it is more compelling that dance on video. With so much video on the web and the web being the way that more people are seeing things to be interested in, it would be a mistake for dance as art not to take part in the grandest way possible. People watching is a great fun activity and we should have people watching us more and more on their computer, iPhones, iPods, cell phones and watches. Perhaps we can learn from Matt Harding of wherethehellismatt.com, he "dances" all over the world, he has a sponsor, he puts his videos on his site and he has a huge fan base.

Added: October 7, 2007 7:06 PM | Permalink

Leave a Comment




© 2007 Great Dance. All rights reserved.
Great Dance is a registered trademark.